Blackboard

Typically, the path of spirituality and hidden knowledge will lead to abilities that can be used to either serve yourself or to serve others. As intuition is a side effect of aligning your mind with the ethereal realm that surrounds us, intuition in all degrees and forms can be regarded as an immaterial reward for seeking to align yourself with the higher order of the universe. Willfully seeking resonance will lead to more resonance, like any feedback loop that reaffirms itself until a certain saturation is reached.

Heightened intuition will at some point cross into extra-sensory perception and clairvoyant abilities that most people do not have access to and are not aware of. Once these abilities are present, it is not a choice to call upon them but rather a matter of observation. You may additionally ask for signs of confirmation, but you may not stop synchronicities from appearing when you live in alignment with the ether. Once you attain resonance, you cannot simply will your way out of resonance other than through highly destructive actions.

So once these abilities are present, the question will not be whether to use them but how to use them.

What if you choose to serve others, but the world around you is collectively going mad and caught up in lies, wound up in more lies until most of what most people believe is a distortion of reality to the point of pure evil? A world grounded in materialism where the powers that control the flow of energy have twisted society to the point where the only thing people worship is money and not nature, morally bankrupting them. Fundamentally, a satanic system.

The fundamental problem is that most people are part of the problem. In the broadest sense, everybody is part of the problem as it is extremely complicated, though possible to distance yourself from feeding the machine. Since every time money changes hands, the machine is reaffirmed, to stop feeding the machine means to stop spending money. How literal you should take this is a personal matter and not the bulk of the issue. The bulk of the issue is that most people literally worship money and are willing to give away their life in order to hoard money. This is a deeply sick state of mind grounded in the most fundamental misunderstanding any soul could ever fall into, namely the idea that money itself would be real when it is not. It is an artificial concept that serves us a means to an end but cannot be an end in itself. Wasting your life, which has meaning itself, to hoard something that has no meaning is by all means stupid and wrong.

To worship the lie in order to hoard money means the truth feels like being robbed. If you confront someone like that with truth, they will feel like you want to steal from them, and as they believe money is a real thing, they will treat you as if you attacked their spirit itself. A person who identifies with the lie will attack you for hinting at the truth, even though that is your best guess at helping them heal their soul.

Helping those who are suffering from lies is fundamentally an act of conflict, and to avoid that conflict is to be selfish.

In order to serve a broken world, it is inevitable to engage in some sort of karma kung fu where you don’t shy away from burning people with the truth, knowing that even if it causes them suffering, it will not generate negative karma. It’s a strange dance where the other person might be perplexed and not understand why they feel the fire, but where their suffering by truth will always carry a message that, as it is true, will inevitably in some way resonate with them.

Ultimately, truth will always persist on its own, and in fighting lies, there’s only so much you can do. Nobody can be saved from their own karma, and those who have spent all their lives serving and benefitting from lies will not be able to be saved from the consequences of those lies. The gift of intuition will mostly be helpful in discerning between those who are still open to the truth and those who are not. As someone who made lies their identity, will reject truth even if they recognise it as truth.

Those who live in lies because they don’t know the truth will, after the initial pain of an inconvenient truth, if it is presented in resonance with their personal experience, keep at least a seed of it in their hearts, and that’s about all you can accomplish. From there on, it’s on them, whether they water it or not.

This video by Ben van Kerkwyk of UnchartedX explores the possibility of one of the most significant archaeological discoveries yet to be fully uncovered—the Great Labyrinth of Egypt. This structure, described by ancient historians as surpassing even the pyramids in grandeur, has been the subject of speculation, suppression, and modern technological investigation.

The presentation, originally delivered at the Cosmic Summit (June 2025), delves into:

• Historical accounts of the labyrinth from Greek and Roman writers.

• Modern expeditions using ground-penetrating radar, satellite scans, and seismic tomography.

• Suppression of discoveries by Egyptian authorities.

• Remarkable claims about a 40-meter-long metallic object buried deep beneath the site.

1. Historical Accounts of the Labyrinth

Multiple classical authors described the labyrinth, emphasizing its immense scale and complexity:

Herodotus (5th century BCE)

• Called it greater than the pyramids, with 3,000 chambers (1,500 above ground, 1,500 below).

• Described 12 massive courts, intricate passages, and white stone columns.

• Mentioned a pyramid attached to the labyrinth via an underground passage.

Diodorus Siculus (1st century BCE)

• Compared it to the Greek labyrinth of Crete, suggesting the Egyptian version was the original.

• Said it was impossible to navigate without a guide.

Strabo (1st century CE)

• Called it equal to the pyramids in grandeur.

• Described hidden chambers, twisting corridors, and a pyramid at its end.

Pliny the Elder (1st century CE)

• Claimed it was built 3,600 years before his time (~3,600 BCE, predating dynastic Egypt).

• Said its columns were made of marble (calcite) and granite.

Pomponius Mela (1st century CE)

• Described 1,000 houses and 12 palaces within its walls.

• Mentioned a single descending entrance leading to a maze-like interior.

These accounts suggest the labyrinth was a multi-level, megalithic structure with vast halls, underground chambers, and advanced stonework.

2. Location: Hawara in the Faiyum

Most scholars agree the labyrinth was located near Hawara, south of Cairo, where:

• Amenemhat III’s mudbrick pyramid stands.

• Lake Moeris (now Lake Qarun) once existed.

• Petrie’s excavations (1888-1911) revealed megalithic foundations beneath the pyramid.

Petrie’s Discoveries

• Found a subterranean quartzite chamber beneath the pyramid (~110 tons).

• Described massive stone blocks, possibly part of the labyrinth’s roof.

• Noted that rising groundwater prevented full exploration.

3. Modern Scans Confirm the Labyrinth

Several expeditions have used advanced technology to scan the site:

Mataha Expedition (2008)

• Used ground-penetrating radar, VLF, and resistivity tomography.

• Found a grid-like structure (~8–12m deep) matching classical descriptions.

• Zahi Hawass allegedly suppressed the findings, threatening the team with arrest.

Geoscan Systems (2015–2016)

• Used satellite-based spectral analysis to detect subsurface anomalies.

• Found four distinct underground layers, with huge halls (80m x 50m) at depths of 40–100m.

Merlin Burrows (2016–2017)

• Used military-grade satellite imaging and seismic data.

• Detected a freestanding 40m metallic object (nicknamed "Dippy") at ~60m depth.

• Suggested it could be a "portal" or ancient artifact of unknown origin.

Correlations Between Scans

• Both Geoscan and Merlin Burrows identified multiple underground levels.

• The depth (40–100m) aligns with Herodotus’ description of 90 steps between levels.

• The scale (1,000+ rooms) matches ancient accounts.

4. Suppression and Political Challenges

• Zahi Hawass reportedly blocked publication of the Mataha Expedition’s findings, citing "national security."

• A Polish-Egyptian geological survey (2009) was halted, and its director jailed.

• Rising groundwater (due to the Aswan High Dam) threatens the site’s preservation.

Why the Cover-Up?

• Cost of excavation: Draining and preserving the site would be extremely expensive.

• Political risks: Admitting its existence without a plan could lead to international criticism.

• Alternative history implications: The labyrinth may challenge mainstream Egyptology.

5. The Future: Could the Labyrinth Be Explored?

• Italian SAR (synthetic aperture radar) team (behind the Giza scans) may investigate Hawara.

• Crowdfunding or international collaboration could fund excavation.

• Urgency: Rising water levels may destroy artifacts within decades.

Conclusion

The Labyrinth of Egypt represents one of the greatest unsolved mysteries of antiquity. Multiple scanning technologies confirm its existence, yet political and logistical hurdles prevent full exploration. If uncovered, it could rewrite history—revealing lost knowledge, advanced engineering, and possibly even anomalous artifacts like the rumored "Dippy" object.

For now, the labyrinth remains hidden beneath the sands of Hawara, waiting for the day when technology and willpower align to reveal its secrets.

EPD LABORATORIES, INC.

PO BOX 10029

SPOKANE, WA 99209

info@epdlabs.org

http://ericpdollard.com

1)

In this Digital Age, the theoretical basis provided for Electrical Engineering has been defiled, reduced to an assemblage of delusive denouncements enforced by a cabal of academic theoreticians. What gives authoritative force to their dictates is the overtly complex and convoluted mathematics which enshrouds them. This mathematics in turn becomes a “right of passage” in teaching and replacing reason and experiment. Once the idols become digitized, they become law, and consequently electricity has become a lost science, relegated to the same scrap heap as alchemy.

However, in historical perspective, the theoretical basis for electrical engineering had achieved a very high level of development at the onset of the 20th century, this to meet the demands of a rapidly developing commercial enterprise, most notably that of the electro-magnetic telegram, and later electric light and power. Electrical science progressed remarkably well in this era, and thus became an exact science which engendered well thought out theories. The foundations of this science were derived from the Experimental Researches of Michael Faraday and their Mathematical Development by Clerk Maxwell. This became known as the “Faraday-Maxwell” Theory of Electricity. J.J. Thomson gives an account of the basis of the theory:

“This method is based on the conception, introduced by Faraday, of tubes of electric force, or rather, of electrostatic induction. Faraday, as is well known, used these tubes as the language in which to express the phenomena of the electric field. Thus, it was by their tendency to contract, and the lateral repulsion which similar tubes exert on each other, that he explained the mechanical forces between electrified bodies, while the influence of the medium on these tubes was on his view indicated by the specific inductive capacity in dielectrics.” (1)

Essential to the Faraday-Maxwell concept is the existence of a fundamental “Electric Medium,” or aether, which fills all space and permeates all matter. Regardless of the fruitfulness of this idea of the aether, and its tubes of electric induction, it was later forcibly driven from electrical theory and replaced with an idol, the “Electron,” and its sacred companion, Einstein-Minkowski Relativity.

In the course of human events there always comes a time when certain forces set out to tear apart what became a well-established and thought out process of reasoning. Such was the objective of the modernistic theoreticians. An excellent remark on this condition in historic events is given by E.T. Whitaker:

“Perhaps nothing in the history of natural philosophy is more amazing than the vicissitudes of the theory of heat. The true hypothesis, after meeting with general acceptance throughout a century, and having been approved by a succession of illustrious men, was deliberately abandoned by their successors in favor of a conception so utterly false, and in some of its developments, grotesque and absurd.” (2)

Meanwhile, as Gustave Le Bon remarks:

“The mathematicians were drawing up formulae, the physicists were making experiments, and these experiments fitted less with the formulae. So soon as the equations no longer agreed with the experiments, the equations no longer agreed with the experiments, the equations were rectified by imagining “hidden forces,” which completely baffled observation.” (3)

2)

The modernistic mathematicians ultimately regained the ground they had lost to Faraday, and electrical science was reduced to meta-physics. The three fundamental commandments established are:

(I)

The abolition of the aether,

(II)

The Enshrinement of a certain set of so-called “Maxwell’s Equations,”

(III)

The idolization of the so-called “electron.”

A discussion of these three commandments follows.

The first commandment, The abolition of the aether:

Nikola Tesla once remarked, “The discovery of the aether was as significant in his era as was the discovery of fire was for primitive man.”

However, at the onset of the electronic age, the concept of the aether was rejected with all the vehemence of religious fanaticism. The justification for this was that no physical model could be devised that could survive the test of experiment. This is no surprise since the aether is not physical and accordingly it is outside the realm of physical science. Many resisted this abolition at its onset at the beginning of the 20th century, one was Oliver Heaviside, to quote:

“As one regards the aether, it is useless to sneer at it this time of day. What substitute for it do we have? Its principle fault is that it is mysterious. That is because we know so little about it. Then we should find out more. That cannot be done by ignoring it. The properties of air, so far as they are known, had to be found out before they became known.” (4)

Joseph Larmor states the following:

“It therefore may be held that, in so far as theories of the ultimate connection of different physical agencies are allowed to be legitimate at all, they should develop along the lines of a purely electric aether until critics of such a simple scheme are able to point to a definite group of phenomena that requires the assumption of a new set of properties and that moreover can be reduced to logical order thereby. A charge of incompleteness without indication of a better way, is not effective criticism in question of this kind, because, owning to the imperfections of our perceptions and the limited range of our intellectual operations, finally can never be attained.” (5)

Larmor continues with:

“From remote ages, the great question with which, since Newton’s time, we have been familiar under the somewhat misleading antithesis of contact vs. distance actions, has engaged speculation, -how is it that portions of matter can interact on each other which seems to have no means of connection between them, can a body act where it is not? If we answer directly in the negative, the spatial limitations of substance are to a large extent removed, and the complication is increased. The simplest solution is involved in a view that has come down from the early period of Greek physical speculation, and forms one of the most striking items in the stock of first principles of knowledge which has been struck out by the genius of that age. In that mode of thought, the ultimate reality is transferred from sensible matter to a uniform medium which is a plenum, the ultimate elements of matter consisting of permanently existing vortices or other singularities of motion and strain located in the primordial medium.” (6)

At the onset of the “Age of Enlightenment,” this concept was revived from the age of antiquity by Rene Descartes in his absolute rejection of “Action at a distance” through an empty or vacuous space devoid of any physical properties. He assumed that force cannot be communicated except by actual pressure or impact. “It is thus erroneous to regard the heavenly bodies as isolated in vacant space; around and between them is an incessant conveyance and transformation of energy. To the vehicle of this activity, the name aether has been given.” (7)

Following this line of reasoning is that of Michael Faraday, which is a continuous transmission of physical actions through an electrified aether. This was one of the first and most important, in the stock of first principles, in the theory of electricity. To quote Lord Kelvin:

“During the 56 years which have passed since Faraday first offended physical mathematicians with his curved lines of force, many writers and many thinkers have helped to build up the 19th century school of the plenum, one aether for light, heat, electricity, magnetism… (8)

“Faraday had strong geometric conceptions which he formulated qualitatively. To the more abstract minds of the European theoreticians, these concepts did not appeal at all.” (9)

At the onset of the electronic age, Faraday’s concept of the electric lines of force were rejected, despite all the physical evidence to substantiate their existence, and the meta-physical notion of action at a distance again reigned supreme. However, action was now presented through so-called “curved space,” to circumvent reality.

The common sense appeal to facts demands the retention of the philosophy of Michael Faraday; that is, this electric aether can be expressed in practical terms as an “electric fluid.” This concept held supreme in the pioneering days of the science of electricity (Ben Franklin). J.J. Thomson remarks:

“The influence which the notion and ideas of the fluid theory of electricity have, ever since their introduction, over the science of electricity and magnetism, is a striking illustration of the benefits conferred upon this science by a concrete representation of the symbols which in the mathematical theory of electricity define the state of the electric field. Indeed, the services which the old fluid theories has rendered to electricity by providing a language in which the facts of the science can be clearly and briefly expressed, can hardly be over-rated. A descriptive theory of this kind does more than serve as a vehicle for the clear expression of well-known results, it often renders important services by suggesting the possibility of the existence of new phenomena.” (10)

Gustave Le Bon provides a similar viewpoint:

“What is called electricity proceeds solely from phenomena from the so-called displacement of the electric fluid or of its elements.” (11)

Electricity will appear as the connecting link between the world of matter and that of the aether.” (12)

“Electricity allowed for the connection of two worlds, the ponderable and the imponderable.” (32)

“Such is the current theory. It is probable that things happen in a less simple, perhaps in even a very different manner; but when an explanation fits in fairly well with known facts, it is wise to be satisfied with it.” (13)

Second Commandment, Enshrinement of the So-called, “Maxwell’s Equations”:

The Faraday-Maxwell theory of electricity has for quite some time served as the principal foundation for electrical engineering theory.

“Maxwell’s brilliant synthesis of all electric and magnetic phenomena as well as their interactions into two simple “field equations” was an achievement of singular grandeur and beauty.” (14)

Well, maybe not really all electric and magnetic phenomena, and what bout the rest of the equations?

“As a matter of historical fact, Maxwell himself never wrote or saw “Maxwell’s Equations.” (15)

In reality, he conceived twenty mathematical propositions, four of which ultimately were named “Maxwell’s Equations,” but these were in reality the result of the combined efforts of Heinrich Hertz in Germany, and Oliver Heaviside in England. As it stands, the physicist prefers Hertz, whereas the engineer prefers Heaviside. However, the fundamental units, dimensions, and terminology from which the science and engineering of electricity derived its basis, are essentially as Maxwell formulated them. This is a rather unfortunate circumstance since these formulations exist in a primitive form, which in turn were “set in stone” by the academians before such formulations could develop into a mature theory of electricity. Also unfortunate is how the work of Herman von Helmholtz was swept under the carpet, which led to the unfortunate omissions in electrical theory.

Hertz gives his comments on this:

“In the researches to which I have hitherto referred, the experiments were interpreted from the standpoint which I took up through studying von Helmholtz’s papers. In these papers, Herr von Helmholtz’s distinguishes between two forms of electric force, the electro-static and the electromagnetic to which, until the contrary is proven by experiment, two different velocities are attributed. An interpretation of the experiments from the point of view could certainly not be incorrect, but it might be unnecessarily complicated. In a special limiting case, Helmholtz’s theory becomes considerably simplified, and its equations, in this case, become the same as those of Maxwell’s theory; only one form of force remains, and it is propagated with the velocity of Light.” (16)

At this historic juncture, the so-called “Velocity of Light” became enshrined, and the electro-static wave faded from existence. But, Nikola Tesla, who worked from the electro-static viewpoint remarks:

“For more than 18 years I have been reading treatises, reports of scientific transactions, and articles on Hertz-Wave Theory, to keep myself informed, but they always impressed me like works of fiction.” (17)

Here, it becomes evident that the so-called Maxwell’s Theory is not without significant limitations. For example, Charles Steinmetz makes a rather harsh statement on this matter:

The Maxwellian Theory of the Transformer describes a device that does not exist in practice, but haunts in textbooks and mathematical treatises on transformers.” (18)

Consequently, what has become known as “Maxwell’s Equations” is in part, of dubious practical value and serves in actuality as a kind of “religious ritual” rather than a fruitful method of analysis.

“At the time of Maxwell’s death, which happened in 1879, before he completed his 49th year, much yet remained to be done both in the investigations with which his name is associated; and the energies of the next generation were largely spent in extending and refining that conception of electrical and optical phenomena whose origin is correctly indicated in the name of Maxwell.” (19)

The three principal figures involved in this extension, or adaptation, of the work of clerk Maxwell were:

1.) Heinrich Hertz
2.) Oliver Heaviside
3.) J. J. Thomson

These illustrious individuals can rightly be called the “Followers of Maxwell.”

“In the decades proceeding the death of Maxwell, his “theory” would be developed in ways which could scarcely have been anticipated. But although every year added something to the super-structure, the foundations remained much as Maxwell had laid them; the doubtful argument by which he had sought to justify the introduction of displacement currents was still all that was offered in their defense. In 1884 however, the theory was established on a different basis by a pupil of Helmholtz, Heinrich Hertz.” (20)

Hertz states, in his book on electric waves, the following:

“And now to be more precise, what is it we call the Faraday-Maxwell Theory? Maxwell has left us as a result of his mature thought a great treatise on electricity and magnetism; it might therefore be said that Maxwell’s Theory is the one which propounds that work. But such an answer will scarcely be regarded as satisfactory by all scientific men who have considered the question closely. Many a man has thrown himself with zeal into the study of Maxwell’s work, and even when he has stumbled upon unwonted mathematical difficulties, has never the less been compelled to abandon hope of forming for himself an all-together consistent conception of Maxwell’s ideas.” (21)

Oliver Heaviside, the leading proponent of Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Theory, comments on the efforts of Hertz to verify this theory:

“Returning to electromagnetic waves. Maxwell’s Inimitable Theory of Dielectric Displacement was for a long time generally regarded as speculation. There was, for many years, an almost complete dearth of interest in the unverified parts of Maxwell’s Theory…”

“Still, however, they wanted experimental proof. Three years ago, electromagnetic waves were nowhere. Shortly after, they were everywhere. This was due to a very remarkable, and unexpected event, no less than the experimental discovery by Hertz, of Karlsruhe (Now of Bonn), of the veritable actuality of electromagnetic waves in the aether.” (22)

Heaviside continues on Maxwell:

"What is Maxwell’s Theory? Or, what should we agree to understand by Maxwell’s Theory? The first approximation to the answer is to say; There is Maxwell’s book as he wrote I; There is his text, and there are his equations: Together, they make his theory. But when we come to examine it closely, we find that this answer is unsatisfactory. To begin with, it is sufficient to refer to papers by physicists, written say during the twelve years following the first publication of Maxwell’s treatise, to see that there may be much difference in opinion as to what his theory is. It may be and has been, differently interpreted by different men, which is a sign that is not set forth in a perfectly clear and unmistakable form. There are many obscurities and some inconsistencies…

It is therefore impossible to adhere strictly to Maxwell’s Theory as he gave it to the world, if only on account of its inconvenient form. But it is clearly not admissible to make arbitrary changes in it and still call it his.” (23)

Professor J.J. Thomson gives a similar view on the problems in expressing the ideas of Maxwell:

“The descriptive hypothesis, that of displacement in a dielectric, used by Maxwell to illustrate his mathematical theory, seem to have been found by many readers neither so simple nor so easy of comprehension as the old fluid theory; indeed this seems to have been one of the chief reasons why his views did not sooner meet with the general acceptance they have since received. As many students find the conceptions of ‘displacement’ difficult, I venture to give an alternative method of regarding the process occurring in the electric field, which I have often found useful and which is, from a mathematical point of view, equivalent to Maxwell’s s Theory.

This method is based on the conception, introduced by Faraday, of tubes of electric force, or rather, of electro-static induction.” (24)

It is evident that three distinct contributions were laid out by these followers of Maxwell’s Theory. First was the experimental verification by Hertz. Second was the development of a suitable mathematical representation applicable to engineering formulation by Heaviside, and Third, an aether physics representation by Thomson.

The problem introduced however, is that Helmholtz Theory was left to be forgotten, and the non-electromagnetic aspect of electricity was thereafter ignored by most with the exception of Nikola Tesla, and possibly Charles Steinmetz.

Heaviside concludes with:

“It is not by any means to be concluded that Maxwell spells finality. There is no finality. It cannot even be accurately said that Hertzian Waves prove Maxwell’s Dielectric Theory completely. The observations are very rough indeed, when compared with the refined tests in other parts of electrical science. The important thing proved is that electromagnetic waves in the Aether at least approximately in accord with Maxwell’s Theory are a reality, and that the Faraday-Maxwellian is the correct one.” (25)

However, Heaviside imposes and arbitrary restriction:

“The other kind of electrodynamic speculation is played out completely. There will be plenty of room for more theoretical speculation, but it must be on the Maxwellian type to be really useful”. (25)

Heaviside is correct in his criticism of the old German electrodynamics, the useless potential theories, and other such illusions in electrical theory, which find their origin as far back as Isaac Newton. However, to ignore the aspects of electrical theory, which are not of an electromagnetic nature is not permissible when framing a general theory of electricity. It is a strange irony that while Heaviside rejects the Helmholtz Theory, (33) his so-called Telegraph Equation does provide the required framework for a true General Theory of Electricity. For an excellent analysis of the development of Electric Transmission Theory, see Ernst Guillemin “Communications Networks”, Volume Two, Chapter One.

Third Commandment, Idolization of the Electron:

To Quote Lucien Poincare:

“The electron has conquered physics and many adore the new idol rather blindly”. (26)

Gustave Le Bon states:

“The conception of the electrons, a near relative to the old Phlogiston, is one of the most unfortunate metaphysical ideas recently formulated…..” The electron has become at present day, a sort of fetish for many physicists, by which they think to explain all phenomena.” (27) (34)

In a toast to a gathering of his illustrious colleagues, J.J. Thomson makes a rather startling remark:

“Here is to the electron, may it be of no use to anyone.” (28)

It must be remembered that it was Thomson himself that is credited with the quantification of the so-called electron, so what would motivate him to make such an outlandish statement? (35)

Charles Steinmetz outright rejected the electron concept, or what he sometimes called the “Ionic Theory of Electricity.” He regarded the notion of electronic charge as an impediment to the understanding of the behavior of electricity, to quote:

“Unfortunately, to a large extent in dealing with the dielectric field, the pre-historic conception of the electro-static charge on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electrical field, the magnetic and the dielectric and makes the consideration of the dielectric field unnecessarily complicated.” (29)

After the introduction of the myth of Santa Clause, we as children are also “taught” that “electricity is the flow of electrons.” It is later learned the truth of Santa, but the fallacy of the electron persists.

Oliver Heaviside writes extensively on the mis-guided notion that electricity is the flow of electrons in a so-called conductor. “A perfect conductor is a perfect obstructer, but does not absorb the energy of the electromagnetic wave…...”

“The properties of a perfect conductor are derived from those common conductors by examining what would happen if the resistivity were continuously reduced, and ultimately became zero. In this way, we find that a perfect conductor is a perfect obstructer, for one thing, which idea is singularly at variance with popular notions regarding conductors…...”

“According to Ohm’s Law alone, a perfect conductor should be one which carried an infinite current under a finite voltage, and the current would flow all through it because it does so ordinarily. But what is left out of consideration here is the manner in which the assumed steady state is established. If we take this into account, we find that there is no steady state when the resistance is zero, for the variable period is infinitely prolonged, and Ohm’s Law is out of it, so far as the usual applications goes…...”

“The smaller the resistance the greater the time taken for the current to get into the conductor from its boundary, where it is initiated. In the limit, with no resistance, it never gets in at all. Where then is the current?” (30)

Heaviside continues:

“The uniformly distributed current of the steady state appropriate to finite conductivity becomes a mere surface current when the conductivity is infinite.”

“In the usual sense that an electrical current is a phenomenon of matter, it has become quite an abstraction, for there is no matter concerned in it. It is shut out completely.” (31)

The electron represents a phenomenon of electronics, but not a phenomenon of electricity. Moreover, the motion of electrons is representative of the time rate of the destruction of electric induction, this is what is known as resistance. The concept of electrons finds, however, useful application in the theory of so-called semi-conductors, such as silicon, carbon, selenium, etc.

Where it is found in practice that electrical devices do not consume energy but serve to convert this energy into another useful form, electronic devices in practice consume nearly all the energy, turning it into useful heat.

The contemporary Leibnitz-Einstein notion of the electron has worked further mischief into electrical theory by it becoming a “catch all” for kindred phenomena, such as the cathode ray, etc.

The electron has become so endeared to the physicist that any criticism of it will draw an almost fanatical reaction.

What has been learned here is that in its fundamental nature, electricity is not a physical phenomenon married to gross physical matter, and such it should be left aside in the Science of Electricity, and the ill-advised pronouncements of the physicist should be ignored.

3) REFERENCES

Recent Researches in Electricity and Magnetism

J. J. Thomson (1898)

(1) Page 2

(10) Page 1

(24) Page 1-3

---

A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity

E. T. Whittaker (1910)

(2) Page 36

(7) Page 1-3

(19) Page 309

(20) Page 353

---

The Evolution of Physics

Lucien Poincare’

(26) Page 324

---

The Evolution of Force

Gustave Le Bon (1908)

(3) Page 35

(13) Page 109

(26) Page 112

---

The Evolution of Matter

Gustave Le Bon (1906)

(11) Page 218

(12) Page 198

(34) Page 227

---

Old Physics for New

T. E. Phipps Jr. (2012)

(15) Page 5

---

Electromagnetic Theory

Oliver Heaviside (Dover 1950)

(4) Article 179, Page 221

(9) Page XIX

(14) Page XX

(22) Article 5, Page 5

(23) Page XXVII

(25) Article 6, Page 6

(30) Article 189, Page 338-339

(31) Page 339

(33) Appendix D, Page 493

---

Aether and Matter

J. Larmor (1900)

(5) Page VIII

(6) Page 23

---

Beyond the Electron

J. J. Thomson (1928)

(35) All

---

Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain

Vol 35 (1951) Page 251

(28) All

---

Electric Dischargers, Waves, and Impulses

C. P. Steinmetz (1914)

(29) Page 13-14

---

Electric Waves

Heinrich Hertz (1893)

(8) Page XV

(16) Page 15

(21) Page 20

---

Theory of Wireless Power

E. P. Dollard (1986)

(17) Page 1

---

Steinmetz, Engineer and Socialist

R. R. Kline (1992)

PRESENTATIONS AND BOOKS BY ERIC DOLLARD

Four Quadrant Representation of Electricity - http://fourquadranttheory.com/

Extraluminal Transmission Systems of Tesla and Alexanderson - http://extraluminaltransmission.com/

Electrical Transmission in Multiple Coordinate Systems - http://extraluminaltransmission.com/

Power of Aether as Related to Music and Electricity - http://powerofaether.com/

Musical Seismograph – Demonstration of the Tesla Converter -

http://emediapress.com/ericdollard/musicalseismograph/

History, Theory & Practice of the Electrical Utility System - http://emediapress.com/ericdollard/utility/

Crystal Radio Initiative - http://crystalradioinitiative.com/

Versor Algebra as Applied to Polyphase Power Systems I & II – http://versoralgebra.com

Lone Pine Writings I & II - http://lonepinewritings.com/

Lone Pine Writings I – Paperback on Amazon -

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1518815936?ie=UTF8&tag=maimounas-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1518815936

INTERVIEWS AND OTHER MISC VIDEOS WITH ERIC DOLLARD

https://www.youtube.com/user/aaronmurakami/search?query=eric+dollard

ERIC DOLLARD’S OFFICIAL FORUM

http://www.energeticforum.com/eric-dollard-official-forum/

ENERGY SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE

http://energyscienceconference.com

ERIC DOLLARD’S FACEBOOK & TWITTER PAGES

https://www.facebook.com/ericpdollard/

https://twitter.com/EricDollard

🚀 What if space-time is just the scoreboard of an information game the universe has been playing since the first femtosecond?

That isn’t sci-fi clickbait; it’s the core hunch behind Informational Phase Space Cosmology (IPS)—a rapidly maturing framework that treats information (correlations, entropic flows, topological “memory”) as the real substance of reality, with the geometry of space-time merely emergent. And the latest James Webb Space Telescope deep-field data just handed IPS the sort of opening scene every paradigm shift dreams of.

🔄 JWST’s weird cosmic spin-bias

Four separate teams probing JWST deep fields report that roughly two-thirds of very-distant galaxies are spinning the same way, an alignment hard to square with an isotropic Big Bang. One group even suggests our entire observable cosmos might be the interior of an ancient, spinning black-hole-like structure—a notion that resurrects Gödel’s old rotating-universe idea and instantly explains the fresh JWST asymmetry(Live Science).

IPS predicts exactly this sort of large-scale vorticity. In its 14-dimensional information manifold, “informational vorticity” twists entanglement currents; when you project that manifold down to 3 + 1 space-time, you see rotating galaxies and preferred axes in the CMB.

✨ Why IPS is so tempting

• Fewer moving parts. ΛCDM needs dark energy, dark matter, and inflation to keep the books balanced. IPS starts with just three postulates (information, correlator geometry, feedback memory) yet still generates curvature, expansion, and matter as emergent bookkeeping—not bespoke patches.
  
  

• Built-in fixes for the Hubble tension. Because our 3-D slice can re-slice the information manifold over time, the locally-measured H₀ will drift relative to early-epoch inferences—precisely what astronomers observe.
  
  

• Natural dark-energy analogue. Accelerated expansion shows up as entropic “pressure” from unfolding informational degrees of freedom, not a mysterious fluid.
  
  

• Cosmic memory. IPS sectors act like neural-network attractors; the universe literally remembers past topological states, giving a concrete path for cosmic feedback and self-tuning.
  
  

🔬 How do we test it—now?

🧩 Where the community can jump in

• Data hackers – scrape JWST rotation catalogs; look for redshift-dependent drift in the spin-bias amplitude.
  
  

• Q-lab folks – emulate the 3-qubit “Pauli-curvature” toy model; compare emergent metric with IPS analytic form (Appendix B of the preprint).
  
  

• CMB statisticians – re-analyze low-ℓ Planck maps with an informational vorticity template instead of a simple dipole.
  
  

• Philosophy-of-science nerds – debate whether IPS’s “universe that learns itself” ontology rescues Wheeler’s It-from-Bit without invoking panpsychism.
  
  

🎯 TL;DR

JWST just lobbed a spinning curveball at standard cosmology. IPS not only expects that curveball, it catches it with one hand while tidying up the Hubble tension and dark-energy fuss. Better yet, we can start shooting at the theory right now with telescopes, interferometers, and quantum chips already humming.

Whether IPS survives those shots or not, the next few years are going to be ridiculously fun—for astronomers, quantum engineers, and anyone who thinks reality might be written in the language of information itself.

Grab popcorn. The data deluge has only begun.

Want to know more? Informational Phase Space Cosmology: A Geometric Framework for Entanglement, Curvature, and Memory Dynamics

Gödelian Phases of Time: Emergent Rotation and Dimensionality from Quantum Temporal Correlations

Permissibility of Dodecahedral Geometry in Informational Phase Space Cosmology

Informational Phase Space Cosmology: Axiomatized and Expanded

Informational Phase Space Cosmology and the Ontologyof Consciousness: Four Interpretive Models Compared

Frame-Embedded Informational Holonomy as a Substrate for Qualia: Formalism, Simulation, and Predictions

Classification and Determination of Topological Knots in Informational Phase Space Cosmology

The Integratron is a unique and enigmatic structure located in Landers, California, near Joshua Tree National Park. Designed by George Van Tassel, a former aircraft mechanic and ufologist, it was built between 1954 and 1959.

Core Technical Design of the Integratron

• Structure: A 38-foot-high, 55-foot-diameter all-wood dome built without nails or metal, using shipbuilding techniques with glued layers of old-growth Douglas fir. The adhesive is primarily paint and caulk, creating a seamless, non-metallic structure.

• Electrostatic Generator: Designed as an "electrostatic generator" for cell rejuvenation and time travel, Van Tassel claimed it harnessed geomagnetic energy from a vortex beneath the site. Magnetometers detect elevated magnetic fields at its center

Eric Dollard’s Role and Technical Contributions

• Last Engineer to Work on the Integratron: Dollard, an electrical engineer and Tesla researcher, was one of the few to understand the Integratron’s original purpose. He designed a pulse modulator for its energy systems, critical for its purported electrostatic functions.

• Connection to Lakhovsky’s Multi-Wave Oscillator (MWO):

  • The Integratron was inspired by Georges Lakhovsky’s MWO, a high-voltage, high-frequency device theorized to enhance cellular health via electromagnetic fields. Dollard reverse-engineered the MWO’s unbalanced design, which used longitudinal waves (non-Hertzian) for energy transmission without loss.

  • Dollard emphasized the MWO’s grounding system (e.g., 16 ground rods in a radial pattern) to optimize Earth’s conductivity, a principle likely applied to the Integratron.

• Four-Quadrant Electricity Theory: Dollard’s work on the Integratron tied into his broader research on dielectric and magnetic induction (Psi and Phi fields), aligning with Van Tassel’s vision of the structure as a "resonant tabernacle" for energy manipulation

Energy and Wave Theories Behind the Integratron

• Longitudinal Waves: Dollard and Van Tassel believed the Integratron could harness longitudinal (scalar) waves, which propagate without energy loss, unlike transverse EM waves. This was key to claims of "time travel" and anti-gravity effects.

• Ether and Electrostatics: Dollard’s theories posited that high-voltage electrostatic potentials could repel the "Ether" (the medium of space), reducing inertia—a concept Van Tassel may have incorporated for the Integratron’s rejuvenation goals.

• Geomagnetic Vortex: The site was chosen for its intersection of geomagnetic forces, which Dollard’s grounding systems aimed to amplify.

As I'm reading Plotinus, I will add, paragraph by paragraph, a reworded, more readable version of what he says, as his ideas are very clear, but the original translation seems unnecessarily cumbersome.

1. Nominalism:

   Plato disagreed with the nominalist view that general terms (universals) are merely names or labels for collections of individual, unrelated things. He believed that universals, like "beauty" or "justice," represent real, objective Forms that exist independently of our minds and the physical world. 

2. Materialism:

   Plato rejected the idea that only physical matter exists. He proposed a dualistic view, arguing for the existence of both a material world and an immaterial realm of Forms, which he considered more real and fundamental. 

3. Skepticism:

   Plato did not believe that knowledge is impossible or unattainable. He argued that while our senses can be deceptive, reason and intellect can lead us to true knowledge of the Forms. 

4. Relativism:

   Plato opposed the idea that truth and morality are subjective and vary from person to person. He believed in objective, universal truths and moral standards grounded in the Forms. 

5. Mechanism:

   Plato rejected the idea that the universe operates solely on mechanical principles, like a machine. He believed that purpose and design, guided by the Forms, play a crucial role in the cosmos. 

6. Sense-perception as the primary source of knowledge:

   Plato argued that our senses can only provide us with imperfect copies of reality, not true knowledge of the Forms. He believed that true knowledge comes from reason and intellectual insight into the Forms. 

Why don't you do a little deep dive into Plotinus, in our library?

Mind map on Neoplatonism

Mind map on Plotinus

First of Plotinus' Six Enneads

We live in an overly materialistic world that is currently obsessed with the illusion that reality could be reduced to that which can be proven.

After decades of scientific stagnation, nobody really wants to admit that scientism has turned into a religion and not into a particularly appealing one. The average person literally understands science as an authoritarian system where truth trickles down a hierarchical system and where lack of evidence for something is equal to disproving something. “Trust the experts” and “Do you have a source for that?” are nothing more than an expression of the fact that the current order is ruled by anti-spiritual midwits.

Reality, however, is something that is deeply obscure, and most of what is real will simply never be proven in a materialistic way. It’s simply not possible, and it’s a foolish assumption.

In order to delve into topics like the nature of reality and the origin of consciousness, we MUST accept that there are different ways of knowing than simply looking at evidence and deductive reasoning. Evidence and deductive reasoning will never conflict with the truth, but neither will they bring to light any new aspects of reality. Materialistic reasoning has reached its limits with what it can accomplish, and anyone who is not satisfied with what it has delivered in the last couple of decades must either turn back to knowledge that was lost in the past or develop new forms of knowing altogether.

Intuition is one of these forms of knowing. 

When you know something but you don’t know how you know it. It’s a form of knowing that is more powerful than evidence-based knowing, because when you know something as a function of data, there’s always a chance that your data was wrong and you therefore drew the wrong conclusion. When you know something intuitively, there can be no doubt about it. 

However, intuition works very differently than evidence-based knowing. In order to increase the amount of evidential knowledge, you simply increase the amount of evidence you look at. Intuition cannot be invoked in a similarly mechanistic fashion. In order to increase the amount of intuitive knowledge you have, you must train yourself to trust your intuition. You don’t increase the amount of intuitive inspiration, but you decrease the number of times when you fail to recognize your intuition.

Becoming a more intuitive person is a deeply spiritual journey that will necessarily lead you on a path of synchronicities and mysticism. You will not see things that you didn’t see before, but you will see what they mean, when before you thought they wouldn’t mean anything.

It’s not like seeing a tree for the first time, but it’s like looking at a forest and, for the first time, realizing it’s made up of trees.

If you’re trying to find the divine in your life, it’s not like invoking something new that wasn’t there before. It’s understanding how it was always there, but you missed it.

To learn to experience and to trust your own intuition is to strengthen your spirit both in perception and in manifestation. It’s a deeply alchemical and transformative process that will lead you to understanding the true meaning of the word gnosis.

Gnosis will never conflict with more simple forms of knowing, but it’s a form of superset of knowing. It is not a form of learning something new but a form of integrating what you already knew the whole time.

If that’s what you’re looking for, then you are who I built this place for, but I am not here to tell you what I know. I am here so you can discover what this place can do for you and attain that goal on your own.

Check out Gurdjieff's Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson summed up in a single chart.

https://www.theagora.space/library/mindmap/1

Within the eternal loop of the ouroboros, the central figure stands serene, poised between heaven and earth. In their right hand, they raise the ankh, the breath of life. In their left, a blue lotus—symbol of resurrection and the awakening of consciousness. Upon their brow rests the golden solar disc, the seal of Ra, bestowing radiance and eternal sovereignty.

Around them swirl the four elemental guardians:

• 🦁 Lion (South) – Fire, Sekhmet, willpower and courage

• 🐂 Bull (North) – Earth, Apis, endurance and stability

• 🦅 Hawk (East) – Air, Horus, vision and spirit

• 🐊 Crocodile (West) – Water, Sobek, memory and transformation

Behind them rise the pyramids, repositories of ancient science. The Eye of Ra blinks open above, representing divine vigilance and the inner gnosis that pierces illusion.

Alternate Title: The Divine Spiral
Element: Aether
Symbol: Ouroboros, Ankh, Lotus
Figure: The Soul-Crowned

You have reached the completion of a cycle, not as an end—but as a return to origin, with consciousness transformed.

The World card is the alchemical coronation: the Philosopher’s Stone achieved, the sacred marriage complete, the soul awakened. You are no longer bound by the elemental planes—you stand above them, in harmony with all.

It reflects the Hermetic axiom:

"Man is a star bound to a body, but through discipline may regain the divine fire."

This card marks:

• The final integration of opposites (matter and spirit, masculine and feminine, above and below)

• Mastery over the self and the material plane

• Reunion with the divine field of intelligence (Nous)

The Fool’s journey ends in gnosis—having walked the labyrinth, they now know it is made of light.

YHWH is just one of that Elohim, not God with a capital G. I thought they would deny it, but apparently they don't.

Interestingly, he calls YHWH the Demiurge of the Jews.

This is quite ambiguous in terms of what role he actually prescribes to him. Creator of the physical universe from the perspective of the Jews? Or something lesser as in creator of a specific part of the universe associated with the the Jews?

I haven't read the book, yet. Just came across this during editing.

“Kazakhstan will soon launch a 'VERY POWERFUL' supercomputer, the first of its kind in the EAEU — Prezident Tokayev, adds “EAEU countries should 'combine efforts' to develop Artificial Intelligence.”

Could it be important, as the capital of Kazakhstan - Astana(formal Nursultan), is also called the capital of NWO, the city of the future’ filled with Illuminati, Masonic and occult symbols?

Starting from the back of the video

1:32:11
You're not going to believe this when I show you this. This is going to be a watershed—it's a watershed in my life. I hope it's a watershed in your life.

You will know 100% certainly that thousands of years, possibly, but certainly hundreds of years of lying has been going on.

I suggest thousands of years, or incredible ignorance—incredible ignorance. You just could not see it.

But I actually think that the evidence suggests that there's been a ridiculous effort to prevent this from being understood.

I'll give you an example: whenever you get into low energy nuclear reactions (or what was formerly misnamed cold fusion, coherent matter nuclear reactions, the effect of the fractal toroidal moment in my book), what people will say is:

“Oh, that's nonsense. It's just what—alchemy? You believe in alchemy?”

I'm going to tell you today: Yes, I do believe in alchemy. Yes, alchemy is real.

You are going to know 100% that people that supposedly never had a computer, never had the ability to do what I've just shown you on an SEM, you're going to know that:

They knew this. And didn't know it slightly. They knew it utterly and completely and precisely.

Someone who was maybe even in the link today sent me this image because it reminded him of the structure I derived from experiment.

This was a ring.
It says:

Fulcanelli ring — believed to have been made with gold obtained by transmutation.

This is the Fulcanelli ring:

• Sun, Moon

• Sun, Moon

• Triangle thing that's offset to one side and centered

• A thing up here—the little cross

This is from 1922.
Yes, 100 years ago.
And it's 2022 here in the Czech Republic.

It belonged to a character called Fanelli (pseudonym—not his real name), who was supposed to be a Templar that had achieved the Great Work, the Magnum Opus, and written some books.

In an article about him (Reference 8), it says:

"Through the breadth of his work, by interpreting the decor of cathedrals from the esoteric and alchemical perspective, Fanelli not only shed a totally new light on medieval art, but also created such emul that the approach to esoteric science was radically changed."

In the same article it says:

The Alchemist Julian Champagne (1877–1932), who was the illustrator of the works of his master F. Canelli, placed a coat of arms at the end of the book The Mystery of the Cathedrals.

I have overlaid this (as me talking) the sacred geometry on the coat of arms, and:

Yes, I think he was an adept alchemist and had likely realized the Great Work, including establishing what the Philosopher's Stone was.

There is no shadow of doubt in my mind that this coat of arms precisely shows the structure.

"Hi Triton."
So thank you for sharing that.

Here's Triton again—Triton Jager.

Triton sent me a link because it resembled both the sacred geometry structure I had established from experiments and also looked a little like the Frank Pfus Windx.

Indeed it does.
He also sent me another link that shows a similar graphic.

In this case:

• Sun on the left, Moon on the right (typical in a Masonic Lodge)

• In this other case, Sun on the right—that’s Ra, the Egyptian symbol for the Sun

• This is also a ring

• And spot orthogonal to this plane

• This shows a wheel in my view within a wheel

• This is the out and the in

And it’s interesting that, in electric current, they show the current:

• Coming towards you with a ring spot

• And a cross on the way back

Anyway—that’s that.

Here we have what I would argue is the disruption beam, and the triangle going in.
It’s very highly stylized.

And here’s the 101 of the Masonic Order.

So there we go.

When you do a reverse image search for this on Google, you immediately get Eye of Providence images and related material.

On doing further research, I came across the images described below.

This image is:

De Calvos Metallium Occultist’s Key — Lapis Veneris of the Cave of the Hidden Metals

“You are the venerable Stone.”

—from Hermes, frontispiece from the Hermetical Triumph or The Victorious Philosophical Stone, Anonymous, 1740.

So this is from 1740—that is nearly 300 years ago.

And look what we see.

I decided to compare it to some experiments in sacred geometry, as well as the Windx.

Here is the result:

• Flow pan

• Sacred geometry structure

• (This is a normal orientation, but for some samples I had to flip it—just like the ring is flipped from the imagery in the other one)

• Down here: Ether, the Spirit

• It comes up

• You have the Destruction Zone—just like you do on Tesla’s Wardenclyffe Tower if you move the electrode down too far

• Very specific areas up here—very carefully defined by this overall structure

You have:

• The crown

• The triangle

• This cross-beam line here

Now just to say—
Look, I’m not saying the Masons have been hiding something.

What I say is:

At the very least, what we can know for certain is that they’ve been trying to tell everyone—whether they knew it themselves.

As I’ve shown you before:

The Masonic Lodge in Brighton—and every single thing about it is nearly perfect.

The only thing I’ll say is:
If you were to have the soic triangle not go to the center here, but move up—
Then, if it was extended out:

• Firstly, it would be a little bit further over at this point

• And it would extend out to the bottom of the door

Bear that in mind when I show you what I’m going to show you.

Down here you can see the VRA—on a coin from 234 Before Christ.
234 Before Christ!
And this is a VRA.

I’ve shown other Macedonian coins with:

• The Thunderbolt

• The Chi-Rho

• The Theadius—very common symbols

The Thunderbolt—or part of the Thunderbolt.

Almost all of these important symbols that you see on coinage for thousands of years are representations of ball lightning.

Now I showed you in 1733—so here we go, 1740...

In 1733, we have this Masonic Lodge.
(I don’t know whether that’s the name of the street, but it had to have 33 in it, didn’t it?)

I mean—it just had to have 33.

So I don’t know whether that’s the name of the street, but anyway—

In there, we have:

• The sacred geometry

• One rotation of sacred geometry from the top-down structures, or what we might like to call:

  Auspicious symbol

And that’s:

• Sun on one side

• Moon on the other

• Together they make an overall structure

• With your beams coming out

• “AO”

Introduction to the technology

(beginning of the video)

So, this has been a really big week for everyone who’s been following the development of Bob Greenyer’s new research on ball lightning—or plasmoids formed via bubble cavitation—and his analysis and testing of Malcolm Bendle’s Thunderstorm Generator, Dr. Bing Wayne Wang’s fusion reactors, and other cavitation systems working on similar principles.

We’ll talk a bit about this and reference some of these other systems a little bit later in the video, too.

So, Bob’s recent findings, which he presented unfiltered, spread over several live streams and videos on the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (MFMP) YouTube channel last week, are really serious findings. The potential implications for nearly every field of science and for every human on Earth are absolutely profound. There’s no other way to put it. This isn’t a drill. I’m not exaggerating.

For a fact, this has actually been quite an emotional week if you’ve been following all of this.

A quick pause to offer thanks to everyone who’s been sharing and liking the videos and particularly a very special thank you to those who donated to the channel. It’s really not easy to work open-source, and it’s directly thanks to you guys that I have time to spend on this video today. And remember that Bob and, MFMP also work in the open-source domain, and you can find their donation links in the description of any of their videos. So, these types of projects are for the community, and they’re funded by the community, and that’s the way things stay out in the open. So, thank you, guys.

So, what are we going to cover in this video? First, I will give you a brief and easy-to-understand overview for the newcomers or those who just got a little bit lost on the way—uh, what the technology actually is, what it does, and what the processes behind it are. So, we’ll introduce some of the researchers, the inventors, and the other main players who’ve been involved in the collective research around plasmoids or ball lightning and how these phenomena can be reproduced and harnessed using various synthetic systems, including, of course, the Thunderstorm Generator, which has been my own passion project for a while now and that was my introduction to Bob’s work, too, and many of these other researchers and systems when I just kind of found out this was way bigger than just the Thunderstorm Generator—although that is a very special system on its own. So, this should set the scene nicely and get everyone up to speed. So, in the second part of the video, we’re going to break down Bob Green’s recent earth-shattering findings and explain what they mean for science, for history, for reality, and for the Thunderstorm Generator and other cavitation systems.

What is this old-new technology? What is it doing? What are the processes behind it? We’re going to start with the basics here, just build up to the most recent findings, tell the full story. So, essentially, this technology itself—no matter which system we’re discussing—is all about water bubble cavitation. So, in simple terms, this means forming a bubble in water, with a few specific requirements, and then collapsing this bubble. So, we want to do this because when bubbles are collapsed or imploded under just the right conditions—uh, what Dr. Matsumoto termed “electron-nuclear collapse”—they produce an unusual phenomenon we call this phenomenon a plasmoid or a charge cluster, ball lightning, or an exotic vacuum object.

So, essentially, the bubble, when collapsed symmetrically into this toroidal geometry, produces a homeostatic fractal ball of lightning that does not immediately dissipate and which can actually feed on anything surrounding it, taking in surrounding gases like hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide and even denser matter like carbon, iron, and other heavier elements, ripping them apart at an atomic level and harvesting them as energy. So, any deconstructed excess energy—uh, to the requirements of the plasmoid—is ejected in the form of free protons and electrons, which then quickly reform and synthesize new elements. So, this process of stepwise synthesis or transmutation has a signature pattern which Bob has clearly identified and outlined in his new findings, but we’ll get to this soon.

So, the reason why they’re sometimes referred to as charge clusters is because ball lightning is fractal in nature—smaller, homeostatic structures collect together to form larger homeostatic structures, and this is all occurring fractally on multiple levels. So, Bob often refers to this as “a wheel within a wheel within a wheel within a wheel,” a phrase I’ve also used to describe this concept in the past, and this is actually from a Bible verse. These phenomena are also found to be naturally occurring—uh, as a ball lightning whizzing through the sky or flying out of a power line or electronic device, seen as a child has been the inspiration for many researchers’ later interest in careers in this field of study. I’ve certainly spoken to many.

So, after they’re formed, the toroidal plasma structures are then employed in subsequent phases of the system, to instigate further reactions. So, for example, in the Thunderstorm Generator, the primary focus so far has been on the transmutation of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrocarbons from the exhaust waste stream of the internal combustion engine and coal power plants, generators into oxygen, nitrogen, or other more suitable elements in this context using no additional energy input. So, this gives us a mechanism with which we can essentially control all pollution caused by the burning of any carbon-based fuel source and also a way to remediate degraded environment—land, air, and sea—almost effortlessly, considering we already use combustion engines for nearly everything. And there’s also some increased fuel efficiency in the engine, due to the plasma structures being both a charged fuel source themselves and a catalyst for the synthesis of other combustible elements, like increased ratios of hydrogen and oxygen that can go into the engine.

So, various other cavitation systems—some of which I mentioned earlier—are producing the same ball lightning structures, which are leaving behind the same highly cohesive pattern of geometric and chemical signatures. The goal of most of these systems has been primarily to just be able to observe and study these formations and reactions and explore how they can be reliably reproduced on a small scale. But in the case of the Thunderstorm Generator, it’s actually in the pre-production prototyping phase already, with the eventual goal of being mass-produced and rolled out on scale to solve a number of practical global issues. And this is kind of updating every week, getting much more serious.

So, to summarize, the various instances of the technology—including the Thunderstorm Generator and Dr. Bing Wayne Wang’s reactors, the systems we will be primarily focusing on in this video—they’re all used to produce tiny water bubbles, which are then imploded under specific conditions to form homeostatic fractal charge clusters, which we call plasmoids or ball lightning. And these plasma structures are then used as a catalyst for further reactions, which can transmute one element to another element, and they can also act as a fuel source themselves.

So, there are various other processes behind the overall results obtained by specific systems., the Thunderstorm Generator, for example, creates extreme hydrodynamic shear in the next stage of the system by polarizing two opposing hot and cold, expanding and contracting, counterclockwise and clockwise vortices—uh, much like the Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube, which you all may have heard of by now. So, this appears to amplify the results, that can be achieved with such a system dramatically, and it takes advantage of much the same process that’s involved in the generation and formation of plasmoids themselves, just at a larger scale simultaneously. So, this is where we need to introduce the story of Bob Green and Malcolm Bendall.

All right, the other name I mentioned—Bob Greenyer—is an open-source volunteer researcher at the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project, a group of independent scientists who were carrying on the work and legacy of Mr. Fleischmann, who was a British electrochemist and a cold fusion researcher who unfortunately passed away in poor health and without really seeing mainstream acceptance of his work in 2012.

So, Malcolm Bendle spent a week with Martin Fleischmann in his later years as well, discussing cold fusion and promised him to help finish his work. So, Martin’s research has been a common inspiration for both Bob and Malcolm. But going back to Bob himself, he’s been involved in this research for at least the last decade. He was one of those guys I mentioned that saw naturally occurring ball lightning when he was younger and just couldn’t shake the curiosity until he eventually devoted his life and career to solving the mystery.

So, Bob’s been involved in numerous experiments studying cavitation and ball lightning over the last decade with MFMP, such as his work on the Supernova Reactor, the Ultra Experiments, Neil Kryon Gold’s Lion Reactor, Hank Yuan’s Vega Experiments, Malcolm’s Thunderstorm Generator, and of course his work with Dr. Bing Wayne Wang and their colleagues on their fusion reactors in Taiwan. And they recently published a peer-reviewed paper, in the journal Nature on the same, which we’ll talk about in a little bit. But these projects only really constitute the tip of the iceberg of Bob’s knowledge and experience. He has an encyclopedic knowledge of current and historical cold fusion research, over the course of his decade with the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project.

He’s reviewed and shared the work of many other significant contributors to the field, including a number of experiments and documents that had not been publicly available in English before. Some significant names in the field that Bob has either collaborated with or promoted or reviewed the work of throughout his time with MFMP include:

• Takaki Matsumoto

• Ken Shoulders

• Anat Klimov

• Anatoli Nicotin

• Max Fomichev-Zamv

• Alexander Shishkin

• Alexander Paranowski

• Slobodan Stankovic

—and this list is in no way definitive. You’ll find the work of many other global fusion and cavitation researchers showcased or referenced over on the MFMP YouTube channel, and I can’t stress how important this repository of open-sourced research actually is because if you start Googling some of these names, you’ll find that a lot of this stuff is really not that easy to find, if you’re not directed explicitly where to find it.

On June 23, 2025, Gurdjieff raised his pen from the grave to conclude the work he set out to finish, marking the dramatic - and unexpected - ending of his essay: "The Outer and Inner World of Man."

For context, readers will want to review the last pages of All And Everything Series 3: LIFE IS REAL ONLY THEN, WHEN I ‘AM.’

Continuing from the last paragraph where we left off,

“And so, among the people with whom I come in contact, the formation of the psychic factors necessary for the manifestation of attitudes diametrically opposed to me must inevitably occur in the following way:”

At the moment of this writing, the understanding created through the process of teaching real, exact “principles” in exact accordance with the structure of our cosmos, where I had next intended to elucidate the knowledge contained in the preceding “megacosmic” metaphor with the reader’s “microcosmic” position, that is, his position as a many-colored lamp as it were.

Instead, upon directing my psyche to mentate on these two aforementioned worlds from (the place of) my third world, the sharpness in contradiction between these two worlds (as a pair) in such drastic contrast with my third world -

At once observing this striking pair created such a brightness in my psyche that this white-hot illumination was forced to spill over into my third cup, to reveal to me for the very first time the degree of vivifying-ness of my own metaphorical cosmic concentration, and its general incompatibility with both the floating connection of interconnected wires and perhaps even in what is called the life of man.

I see that the intensity of the manifestation of my “psychic formation,” that is, the structure of laws created from the conscious initiative I used to impress upon others - just in the same manner as my previously mentioned repealed “hypnotic influence” -

Such intensity does not cause a blending or fusion as it does in mechanical life, and I see the reason why “pressing the most sensitive corn” has become increasingly less viable over this duration of time.

And, Dear Reader, as I have promised to disclose to you in generally accessible understanding, is here in the words of my unwitting accomplice:

“The vibrations given off by one light, if they are active, that is, of greater radiations or intensity (volume and quality) then those relative to lights nearest to it, then those vibrations will surge through the wires connecting them.

This new inflow to the receiving light will fill up to the limits of its totalities. The possibility of a change in atmosphere

( As a reminder, atmosphere which can dynamically change based on one’s present state, changing the possible spectrum of color and possible volume of expansion )

is dependent on an affinity, this affinity is in accordance with a relationship concerning

Degree of Contradiction between two lights and Distance (Intimacy) + Time.

Equations for this relationship can be easily generated.

The possible affinity or possibility of fusions between two lights for a change in the receiver’s atmosphere is based on, how similar the two lights are, the proximity of those two lights running counter to duration of time.

The receiver’s cup will fill at a speed based on their difference.

The cup will fill faster if there is a greater degree of contradiction.

The cup will fill faster based on prolonged duration of proximity.

And because nature is not wasteful, returns diminish and become negative after the receiver’s cup is full.

One can gain understanding from this if they consider why the followers of an awakened being usually do not awaken, while passersby making contact with an awakened being only in a few chance encounters in a lifetime often become awakened themselves.

I must say that if you observe how cups with varying degrees in quality come to meet, you will see the Law of Accidents in action, and know why it is that people in relationships meet at which moment.

And, why meeting at the “wrong moment” or in excessive duration is wasteful, harmful, and gives negative results. Thousands or millions of people know this innately and many privately have worked it out themselves.

Back to the formula at hand, we can imagine it takes a duration of time for the increased volume in the receiver’s cup to travel down the next wire to the next light.

What a waste it would be for a person with a high degree of quality to pour into a person connected to only 20 wires (or at least to have only 20 others in their regular vicinity.)

What potential gain to pour into one who connects to thousands or millions of wires (such as one like Ouspensky!)

Although there are significant limits, and although it is only suitable for “the first and second baptisms,” stages of human development, we can see why Gurdjieff “turns down his pitch” by directing his efforts into written form; into books.”

Having taken from my disposed of accomplice, refer back to what I have said:

The diametrically opposed actions from others towards me, and the duration of contact I have spent with them - in spoken and written form.

From The Author:

We know that a Conscious person can measure their life in breaths, and Gurdjieff writes that he has 1-3 years to live. Anyone who has read his work can work out that at the moment Gurdjieff calculates the cost of effort in explaining the principle he outlined in relation to the people with which he comes in contact, he determines he cannot afford it. He will not die like Mozart to complete Requiem.

We do not make decisions for a singular reason.

We make a number of considerations and derive from them a conclusion, a conclusive decision.

With that in mind, we can consider that Gurdjieff could at least reasonably expect that “after my death the principal aims of my life would be.. realized.” From this quote I have removed the word “certainly”.

Yes, his previous writings could be understood exclusively by those readers acquainted with his language.

Yes, he had not published in a way that is accessible to everyone.

Yet, by evidence of his quote (see the beginning of All and Everything Series 3,) his first series of writings contained his complete - or most of his - teaching in “stone” form.

Then as it is for a man who puts the world on his shoulders, there is consolation in recognizing that his students certainly have no trouble with general speak, and may be able to carry on these Conscious Labors.

Note:

No A.I. or any similar technology was used in the production of this content.

Our library now features the multidisciplinary work Tertium Organum by P.D. Ouspensky, blending logic, esotericism and mysticism and arguing the idea that human consciousness can perceive a "third order" beyond dualistic thinking.

Eric Hecker - Antarctica Firefighter for Raytheon Exposes Scary Earthquake Weapon.

It's not what we know or what we were allowed to know.

It's what we don't know as it is intentionally hidden, it's a secret. Why? 

Short video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/r58aahFdSpM

Whole interview Shawn Ryan Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rckecs0PKI4

Our library now contains The Paradoxes of the Highest Science by Éliphas Lévi.

May you use it to lift your ignorance and perhaps even share your insights with the rest of us.

“As AI continues to transform industries, nuclear energy is going to become a more vital energy source to help power these capabilities,”

Nvidia, through its venture capital arm NVentures, has joined Bill Gates and HD Hyundai in raising $650 million to back TerraPower, Gates’ nuclear power startup founded in 2006.

AI needs a lot of energy. The only reasonable solution was - 'go nuclear'. Big guys play with millions billions and win again. Nvidia stock is on the rise. And, as per usual, nothing happens without Billy Gates to hell, the doctor of everything.

...but, somewhere war(s) is happening, isn't it. Oh, but not for big important guys, you say? War is war, it's always 'happening somewhere', but business is business.

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/nvidia-goes-nuclear-company-joins-bill-gates-in-backing-terrapower-a-company-building-nuclear-reactors-for-powering-data-centers